By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Imaginedvl said:
VGPolyglot said:

Well, someone has to be right. If the United are wrong, then he is right. Also, United were complicit in the actions of the police/security. They knew that he didn't want to get off, and they knew that force would be needed to get him off. The CEO at first didn't even acknowledge anywrongdoing with the way he was taken out, so they were obviously fine with it. And yes, I think that being right means that you shouldn't have to cooperate with the police, because the police shouldn't have free reign to do whatever they want.

Man either you are doing this on purpose or you really don't get it... 

Right or not... Airport authorities != United Airline...
Finally, you comply to the authorities asking you to de-plane. Even if it is because they do like the color of your socks... You just do it and then you can fill a complain and win millions...

But you said it again, you do not think cooperating with authorities is a normal. I guess speed limits are just a recommendation for you and you feel in your right because you car speed meter goes up to 300 km/h after all, you have the right to.

 

Being complacent allows them to do things like this in the first place. If everyone stood up to them, they wouldn't get away with it. You're talking about suing based on the assumption that everyone can afford to sue: guess what, most people can't afford thousands and thousands of dollars to go to court.