By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
VGPolyglot said:
Imaginedvl said:

2) What you are saying is basically to be an archist :)

Like ("you" being the dude): you do not like this rule or think that the rule does not exist (because it is about how dumb or unfair the rule is here, you have to realize that) therefor you choose to do not listen to authorities and do whatever the fuck I want, Including delaying not only the fly I'm on with hundred of passengers but also most likely fucking up other flight those 4 employees (crew) are need for. Sorry but I will never agree this is the right thing to do in a society.

There are just right ways to do things. Forcively resisting the authorities when they are trying to get you out of a plane... Is not one of them :)
Suing United after being de-plane and proving they were wrong, is the right way to do it.

Actually, anarchism isn't the belief that you can do whatever you want. Anarchism is the ideology that opposes unjustified authority and a repressive hierarchy. Of course, this would fall into that category, as a rich company were able to use their police cronies to beat the shit out of a guy for the horrific crime of wanting to ride a plane that he paid for.

That's a nice way to justify anarchism in some case for sure :)
But that apart, I do not why it was not justified in the first place. There is a difference between justified and being considerate you know.

If United has a clause in the contract you need to follow when you buy a ticjet, saying they can ask someone to get removed (eps. for the good of many in that case because another plane was waiting for the crew); nothing is un-justified here. you can call this very bad customer treatement or service but nothing is wrong at the end.