By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
TheLegendaryWolf said:
VGPolyglot said:

Yes, because the logic should be "they're killing people, so why can't we?".

The 1400 civilians killed weren't targeted. The US military didn't just say"time to kill more innocents" no, you can thank ISIS cowards for using civilians as human shields every time the allied coalition tries to eradicate terrorists. It's unfortunate that so many civilians lost their lives but the cold hard truth is that it was inevitable. By your logic the US and the coalition should just leave ISIS alone to their devices and let them take over the country, not only endangering the citizens but also the humanitarian aids that are helping the injured civilians. 

It's a pretty big dilemna. If you want to avoid killing innocents, then you need to entirely remove yourself from the armed conflict. There's no other alternative, but that will lead to ISIS being able to do whatever the hell they want which will be really bad. Ideally, the US should do do whatever it can to avoid armed conflict, but alas Obama decided to get involved in Syria and here we are with Trump recently ordering missile attacks.