Seems fair. As far as scores go, I mean. I personally think something like how much one enjoyed a game is way too dynamic and fluid to be accurately measured numerically, and waaay too contextual to be reconciled against one another on something like metacritic.
One man's 4/10 is another man's 8.5/10.
But as someone who makes use of the entire 0 to 10 spectrum, Jim's 5/10 makes sense to me. The game is all over the place in terms of quality. Some aspects are pretty good, others are not so great, others are atrocious, others are fantastic.
It's like... A terrific game struggling mightily to escape the confines of a terrible one, adding up to a merely 'okay' experience.
It needed longer in the oven, hence their vowing to continue working on it post launch - because it just isn't bloody finished!
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
