| cannonballZ said: Budget 4k TV's are not the same as high end models. They suck, they really do. I tried one out before I bought a $2,700 dollar 4k tv. The biggest difference is when watching movies, so much blur in the picture it's ridiculous. Though, that was back in 2014, I haven't tried recent budget models. They may have improved a bit since. Last year I went straight for the high end model, didn't bother with the budgets. |
Which tv did you buy and which did you compare it with? Not that I disagree in principle just curious. You can't job lot all budget tv's or all expensive tv's as many sets at many price levels have failings, yes they are much more likely with budget sets but many mid range sets can comfortably outperform poor higher end sets. I've been to a house where they had an expensive tv with a VA panel but the room was organised so many people were left of the screen and at that angle the colour was distorted. An IPS screen would have been fine in the same situation or at least improved. I've seen mid-high end sets that either give a wonderful picture with judder or motion blur without judder and to be honest the blur was better and less distracting and so many people turn off that image processing anyway which they have paid good money for. Personally I'm of the opinion that expensive set should equal OLED. It's got amazing colours, smooth motion and just seems a class above LCD sets and that justifies its premium.
