Google's strangulating independent political media on Youtube

[VGPolyglot]

Lawlight said:

VGPolyglot said:

So, if a Nazi promotes black genocide, and people make a counter-protest, that would be considered as a restriction fo freedom of speech to you, because they're taking actions against him? But then wouldn't it be restricting freedom of speech by not allowing people to freely speak against certains types of speech?

There is a difference between encouraging harm to others vs., for example, making a joke like Colin Moriarty did. You know something is wrong when someone gets fired for making a joke on Twitter. That's not freedom of speech. Another example is Canada which passed a law restricting criticising of Islam. Which reminds me of this:

https://i.redd.it/afiwot3c4jny.jpg

Canada did not pass a law restricting criticism of Islam. Read it again:

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/m-103-islamophobia-motion-vote-1.4038016

It says right in there that it's non-binding, which means that it has no legal worth. So, in other words, it's meaningless.