VGPolyglot on 07 April 2017
Lawlight said:
Your idea of freedom of speech is being able to express yourself without the government taking action against you. Actual freedom of speech is being able to express your opinions without government or society taking actions against you. If you say water is wet and an organisation takes measures to affect your livelihood, then you don't have freedom of speech. |
So, if a Nazi promotes black genocide, and people make a counter-protest, that would be considered as a restriction fo freedom of speech to you, because they're taking actions against him? But then wouldn't it be restricting freedom of speech by not allowing people to freely speak against certains types of speech?
