| HollyGamer said: Who said that ??? You LMAO. It's science , is not economiuc class LMAO |
I think you might be a little confused?
| WagnerPaiva said: Not at all. I believe in Biblical Genesis narration word by word. Fossiles and coal were formed in the supernatural Flood of Noah and everything. However, Evolution it is the only alternative to God people have created so far, and, with the ever increasing hatred against the God of the Bible, I do expect Evolution to gain more and more strenght, till they decide to push Panspermia to replace it. Creationism will never be accepted till the prophecies in Revelation get fulfilled, no big deal, it is all according to the scriptures, almost the whole world must reject God and it looks like we are heading that way. |
Then you are wrong.
The fact that you support Genesis means you support the Bibles Old Testament and thus it would be contradictory if you didn't also support Death to homosexuals, support for owning slaves, against divorce, women to serve men and stoning of unruly children that is outlined in the Old Testament and many more immoral acts.
I suggest you read this which thoroughly debunks the Genesis account. - http://www.huecotanks.com/debunk/genesis.html
The Bibles Genesis contradicts everything we know about the Universe, Earth, Life forming on this planet and the evidence that is provided to support those Models.
A significant amount of Christian Theologians would also disagree with your hypothesis that Genesis is factual, far to much evidence on the contrary my dear watson.
Besides, it's easy to disprove Genesis. - There was no world-wide flood.
Australia is the oldest continent with the oldest soils which never experience any flood or Ice-flows that covered the entire continent. There would be evidence otherwise.
| fatslob-:O said: I'd say yes but to avoid moderation I won't elaborate a whole lot ... Evolution is a known fact but what seriously grinds my gear is how academically dishonest a large part of the community is when it comes to eugenics which is solidly based off of Darwin's theory of evolution ... It's extremely ironic how the anti-Trumpkins/theoconservatives try to use the theory of evolution to stick it hard to their respective groups but whenever any topics related to social darwanism comes up, they try as hard as possible to undermine the very underlying theory they used to attack those of religious partisanship thus creating cognitive dissonance in the end LOL ... Liberal pro-abiogenesis atheists had best learn to not bully others of different pools knowledge and beliefs when there are arguably nastier bullies to show them how much more wrong they are too ... |
The annoying thing I find is that many Anti-Evolutionists believe that Dawin's model is the only model we have on Evolution, when it simply isn't the case.
Darwin was wrong on allot of things... And that's okay. Science doesn't care.
The theory of Evolution has expanded from that original scope and there is signficantly more evidence to support Evolution today.
Also interestingly... I am having a debate with a Theist (HollyGamer) via personal message at the moment who believes that Evolution isn't a Scientific fact, despite the overwhelming evidence saying the contrary, that kind of thinking holds humanity back.
| Torillian said: Also, have you considered radiometric dating and how you can explain things like Pb dating the planet to billions of years old? I'm curious how those in your camp have tried to get around those results. |
Don't forget the Cosmic Microwave Background which allows us to see what the Universe looked like when it was extremely young.
Plus we have Ice-core dating, sediment dating, tree ring dating,
www.youtube.com/@Pemalite
