| Rath said: @Timmah. Once again, the use of the word design is incorrect but that doesnt mean the scientists using it believe in ID. The fact that scientists often use poor English to make their point simply because its hard to explain it in correct English doesnt constitute any kind of evidence for the existence of a diety. |
The reason they use this word is that there's no other word that logically fits. The complex systems seen in nature all have a purpose because they were designed. I believe that scientists work so hard to explain God away, ignoring evidence to the contrary, because they don't like the existence of something they can't explain.







