By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
VGPolyglot said:
palou said:

Socialism would require intervention to redistribute wealth, no? And who is to intervene, if not someone that is collectively decided upon (which makes it a democratic government.)

It doesn't need a state to do that. The people would have to take control of the workplace and it make democratic, which by then it would make the state redundant. I do support a democratic system, it's just that I support direct democracy instead of representative democracy.

If you introduce the democratic principle (mayority decisions) there will be no more anarchy because all people have to follow majority decisions.

If 51% decide that alcohol is forbidden, will the remaining 49% have to follow that law in your example?