By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Rpruett on 25 March 2017
Edit Thread
Bandorr said:
Rpruett said:

Operative word is 'wiretapping' -- which if you want to be literal can have a very, specific and narrow definition.  The assumption by most readers would be spying or 'watching' him, his team and his associates through any and all means.

Donald Trump is that you? You will be happy to know I sold my Microwave just like Kelly Conway told me too. I know it was spying on me.

Let's see the FBI says they aren't. The NSA says they aren't. Nunes has backed off it. And even Trump and Breitbart have offered no evidence.

So we have a bunch of people saying no, and a couple crack pots offering no evidence.  Yet you believe the crackpots? Hilarious.

I'd ask if you also believe in Pizzagate but even Alex Jones is backing off that.

Whenever talking to the actual point fails,  resort to strawman -- mission achieved.    

No mention of wikileaks?  Why don't you challenge those?  The FBI, the same FBI that people did trusted, didn't trust, now again they trust?   The same James Comey who admittedly and willingly justifies lying to reporters ? (http://video.cnbc.com/gallery/?video=3000602807  The NSA, the same NSA where James Clapper 100% lied about surveilance before in front of congress?   Nunes said Trump wasn't "wiretapped", originally as well as after the fact.  He did make mention of the "incidental" collection of Trump and his associates though. (My how convenient).