By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Zekkyou on 23 March 2017
Edit Thread
Wyrdness said:
Zekkyou said:

It's not just the handheld argument that can nullify your assumed contradiction though, all three of the variables I've previously brought up can. If he's using it as a tablet, he still has to carry it around (and for most titles he'll also need to bring a core controller to put the JCs into). As both a handheld or a tablet, he could simply prefer it to be smaller. As i previously mentioned, i prefer the iPad Air to the standard model, despite them both being equally comfortable in my hands. Do you consider that contradictory too?

So, given the above, for your assumed contradiction to makes sense you have to make an assumption about your assumption. It becomes "Yoko is talking about it as a [variable], specifically in the context of [variable] ". When choosing between that and the more linear alternative, yes, i find your choice odd. 

I don't see much room for interpretation in the aforementioned "previous comment", so there's not much more i can do to expand upon that for you sorry.

You're not really showing how the argument is nullified, some earliar made mention of it fitting in his pocket and as shown if Vita can fit in your pocket Switch will easily fit in your pocket as well or match it in size for all else this is why I mention it is somewhat of a contradiction and clarification would be nice. Even if used as a Tablet it'll fit and is smaller than other tablets which further backs my point on clarifying only variable that falls in line with his statement is when the JCs are attached. If anything I don't see what your argument is built on here as I've clearly highlight what my points refer to while you keep going on some round about trip about assumptions which tbh is starting to not make any coherant sense as far as the argument goes especially when the suggestion of him clarifying what he means is brought in. so no assumptions need to be made.

The's no assumed contradiction as the point is explained if you're struggling to understand  or haven't read the posts properly and refuse to ask what is meant or simply just want to continue being awkward then tbh that's not my problem as tbh your whole argument is odd to me going from you assumption fairyland talk to your complaints about people responding to the statement.

Do you know which variable he is discussing? No. 
Do you know in what capacity he is referring to any of those variables? No.
Do you have to assume specific results for both of these variables to arrive at a contradiction? Yes.

I can't be any clearer than that. It's fine if you disagree with his preferences for those variables, assumed or not, but it requires a very specific combination to arrive at a contradiction. Therein lies my confusion.

As a side note, you're being more aggressive than this discussion justifies. It started with interjections of stuff like "blah blah", and now we've arrived at "assumption fairyland". I don't care what you think of me or the discussion, it's not hard to be polite. You can say i'm wrong, confused, silly, whatever, but there's no need for active mockery.