By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Zekkyou on 23 March 2017
Edit Thread
Wyrdness said:
Zekkyou said:

My core point doesn't rely on an assumption though. As i just said, his preference may very well be contradictory. I don't know, which is precisely the point. I have to assume there is one, which by extension means there isn't inherently one within the current OT. The absence of information isn't inherently contradictory, and in the absence of an assumption it's just an unspecified personal opinion.

I only mentioned my conversation with goodnightmoon because you said something that ran counter to something i had said to you. That conversation with him happened to add additional context, so i mentioned it in the hope it'd help clear your confusion on that point.

Once again, there is more than one variable to size. Clarification would specify which variable he was talking about, but that doesn't change the fact that none of those variables are inherently contradictory. I listed the biggest three in my previous comment, and even your assumed contradiction don't nullify all of them.

I've not said anything about your intentions or "agenda", i just found it odd. If i thought i knew why you'd done it, then it wouldn't be odd :p

I'm not sure where you're getting this idea i don't like people responding. I also responded to the thread. My replies to others have been aimed at the logic behind some of those replies, not the act or tone of them. The ones i chose were the most recent.

If some variables mean the is a contradiction then the should be some clarification otherwise you have to accept the responses that come your way when you make statements of any sort, absence of information can be a contradiction despite what you're trying to push, your argument is based on the belief that something has to be in your hand to be a handheld something that doesn't right true with me as I've highlighted that it's portable mode renders it a handheld regardless of how it is played being an evolution of that market.

When you keep going on about how you find this and that odd about replies of who ever it comes across as you bringing up intentions especially when you keep going on about how what he said was tame blah blah. Well the replies to his statement are tame so what's the problem which calls such a response into question, if someone posts a statement or an opinion people are free to respond to it so why would replying be odd in the first place, that's why to me you're coming across as not liking people responding to the statement.

You seem to be confused about my beliefs again. You say my argument is based on the belief the system has to be in your hands, yet that runs counter to most of what I've said and argued. In the comment where i mention how i define a handheld, my following argument literally starts with "regardless", as my personal definition isn't relevant to what i say. In a comment before that, i present my argument under the explicit assumption that it's *not* being used as a traditionally hand held handheld. In several, I've also mention variables your assumed contradiction doesn't nullify.

My previous comment already addresses the second paragraph, but it's worth noting that your comment is the only one I've called odd. My only other conversation was with goodnightmoon, and his only assumption was a neutral one. He just doesn't understand some of the alternatives, which is fine. We all run into that sometimes.