| Wyrdness said: You replied to me so unless you state otherwise you're assuming his stance when replying I don't care what discussion you had with someone else as that's nothing to do with me and only between the two of you. I said the statement comes across as being a bit contradictory and gave a reason why as the two devices are near enough the same size (image above) to the point that even adding the JCs isn't much of a change in size if anything I find it more odd with you trying to spin some kind of agenda out of people responding to the statement. I've told you straight if he clarfied his preference is in regards to solely using it with the JCs attached then that's fine clarification can do quite a bit to explain context, choice of words doesn't override the basic point that people are responding to which is about size that argument is null and void here and the responses to him are just as tame which is why I question why you have a problem with people responding him to begin with. |
My core point doesn't rely on an assumption though. As i just said, his preference may very well be contradictory. I don't know, which is precisely the point. I have to assume there is one, which by extension means there isn't inherently one within the current OT. The absence of information isn't inherently contradictory, and in the absence of an assumption it's just an unspecified personal opinion.
I only mentioned my conversation with goodnightmoon because you said something that ran counter to something i had said to you. That conversation with him happened to add additional context, so i mentioned it in the hope it'd help clear your confusion on that point.
Once again, there is more than one variable to size. Clarification would specify which variable he was talking about, but that doesn't change the fact that none of those variables are inherently contradictory. I listed the biggest three in my previous comment, and even your assumed contradiction don't nullify all of them.
I've not said anything about your intentions or "agenda", i just found it odd. If i thought i knew why you'd done it, then it wouldn't be odd :p
I'm not sure where you're getting this idea i don't like people responding. I also responded to the thread. My replies to others have been aimed at the logic behind some of those replies, not the act or tone of them. The ones i chose were the most recent.
