By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
JaggedSac said:
sc94597 said:
JaggedSac said:
sc94597 said:
@ JaggedSac
$500 dollar pc running crysis on high
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-graphic-game,1907-4.html

Intersting bench-mark. At only 1024X768 the system could only manage a measly 37 fps with no AA. Not impressive. Wonder if they actually played a large portion of the game, including fights with explosions and heavy usage of the physics engine, because they never specify. What you just proved is that even at a baseline of $500 the Crysis graphics that everyone loves so much, just aren't there. Now increase the resolution to where it is widescreen. See how the frame rate likes that. The XBox360 handles my 42" 1080p well. That IGN reviewer's system is well over $500.

YEt the game probably looks better than any console game. Good luck playing the mass of array iof 1080p games.......oh wait. SO your point?

 


 Actually GoW looks pretty darn good.  And in fact looks worse on the PC.  Textures are more important than polygons.  UT 3 looks better than Crysis in my opinion and runs better too.


 And that is your opinion, but technically crysis has better graphics. And I hope you aren't saying crysis overall?