By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
vivster said:
JEMC said:

Ok. Still it doesn't change the fact that I'll still choose picture quality over a faster monitor. Both things would be nice, of course, but then comes that little annoyance called price that settles it once and for all.

Besides, except for the ocasional FPS, I spend most of my time playing slow paced games like RTS, City builders or simulators, so having a monitor with higher refresh rate won't benefit me as much as it would to a fan of Rocket League or someone who plays lots of action games.

Why not both?

http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Monitor-Display-Hardware-154105/News/ROG-Swift-PG27UQ-mit-144-Hz-und-4K-1217477

Can't wait for this beauty.

It will be a great monitor, if it lives up to the expectations and doesn't suffer from as many problems as other AOC based monitors, but 2,000 € is a hell lot of money.

I'd rather go with a 24-25" 1440p monitor like the Dell U2515H (that's 5 times cheaper at 400 € in this store, maybe less in others) or, and now I'm really pushing it for my budget, an ultrawide monitor like LG's 34UC98-W that's still less than half the price (on that same store) than the monster you've listed.



Please excuse my bad English.

Currently gaming on a PC with an i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070

Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet    Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.