Colin Moriarty is back

[Aura7541]

WolfpackN64 said:

Aura7541 said:

And absense of evidence is not evidence of absense. Considering I was the first one to ask you to provide quantifiable evidence and you couldn't, your argument still does not hold up to scrutiny. So tell me to grow up all you like because you're the one who keep falling into the fallacy pitfalls.

Your argument is basically: You hold a certain word as existant and a carrier of meaning -> I dispute this -> you claim I can't back this up statistically (basically you say I don't know everyone, which is true, but the same is true for you) -> I refer to an absolute authority (an official dictionary) -> you reject the authority and go back to square one.

You're intentionally creating a circle of so called fallacy pitfalls which are nothing more then an abolute rejection of everything I brought forward. Of course, nothing I would bring forward helps. I could throw Oxford dictionary's at your head, you'd play with it like the children you are.

And guess what? If you want to prove that the authority is valid, then you need to argue on the merits of the term as in show me the reason why the dictionaries do not include Regressive Left in the dictionary and why that reason is valid. It always goes back to arguing the merits. This is not a circle I made. This is a circle you made.