Colin Moriarty is back

[WolfpackN64]

Aura7541 said:

WolfpackN64 said:

But you have zero evidence to claim the contrary. All you people do is make up discussion with layers of mud atop of each other. The term has no merit exept in your fantasies, where you can make claims against people all you want and when they start talking back, throw looping constructions, pointless terms and cries of violations of free speech at our heads. And I've insulted enough people on this forum to know that not all truths are easily accepted here, but free speech is a two ways street. You better learn that and grow up.

And absense of evidence is not evidence of absense. Considering I was the first one to ask you to provide quantifiable evidence and you couldn't, your argument still does not hold up to scrutiny. So tell me to grow up all you like because you're the one who keep falling into the fallacy pitfalls.

Your argument is basically: You hold a certain word as existant and a carrier of meaning -> I dispute this -> you claim I can't back this up statistically (basically you say I don't know everyone, which is true, but the same is true for you) -> I refer to an absolute authority (an official dictionary) -> you reject the authority and go back to square one.

You're intentionally creating a circle of so called fallacy pitfalls which are nothing more then an abolute rejection of everything I brought forward. Of course, nothing I would bring forward helps. I could throw Oxford dictionary's at your head, you'd play with it like the children you are.

 

Moderated ~ CGI