sc94597 said:
When presented with cherry-picked "evidence", certainly. Notice how he has to categorize the reviews by their score, as if a 0 is any worse than a 1 when neither reviewer played the game. Furthermore, he makes the assumption that none of the people who voted a zero for BoTW and did not vote anything for Horizon are Horizon (or Sony fans.) A positive review entails more work than a negative review, because you are actually reviewing the game and not pretending to. For most of the voters, the 0 for BOTW is their only review, likely newly created accounts for that sole purpose. You also can find plenty of people who gave 10's to Nioh, Bloodborne, Demon's Souls, etc are the ones doing the 0's in BoTW comments, and since you can't see all of their reviews/ratings on their page (only the most recently voted high one) , you don't know if they also voted 10 for Horizon or not. http://www.metacritic.com/user/skilly225 http://www.metacritic.com/user/Ytrerio http://www.metacritic.com/user/Hunter2020 http://www.metacritic.com/user/Lampiaobr http://www.metacritic.com/user/AmazedBunion http://www.metacritic.com/user/GamingTV http://www.metacritic.com/user/Kayno1 (Reviewed Mar 4th) http://www.metacritic.com/user/Razv (Reviewed Mar 3rd) http://www.metacritic.com/user/GK0 http://www.metacritic.com/user/Inanis http://www.metacritic.com/user/Juhiz http://www.metacritic.com/user/ivand88 http://www.metacritic.com/user/skysayrain What is "for shame" is that you didn't look into it yourself. |
Your examples are insane.
First you are linking 7/10's, wich are beyond the scope of metabombing and relations to other games aswell. That is not what he is talking about.
Also, are those fakes or are those people who took them down after he named them? Hm? The desperation continues.
All this cause he made a justified 7/10 review hm? How terrible he is and how self-righteous Zelda fans are! This is beyond ridiculous.