Nier Automata Review Thread. Metacritic: 89!!

[Faelco]

BraLoD said:

Faelco said:

Thanks to a turkish review barely one page long, and apparently the guy didn't go really far in the game. According to Google Trad, he complains about having to play the same game from beginning to end several times, and says that the story is full of holes. So he maybe didn't even play the second part, and surely never heard of the rest of the game, I'm sure he stopped at the Square Enix message at the end of the first part.

"I played the game's intro and I didn't understand everything about the story, it sucks". I hope guys like this aren't paid for such a poor job...

Well, it's still a great score, between Nioh and Horizon, and Nioh is a freaking masterpiece.

I know. But seeing the score going down because some pseudo-reviewers are too stupid to understand that the game has more than one part and don't even try to play after this first part is annoying. There is even a message saying "launch the game again"...

It's like a reviewer saying "I played 3 hours and I didn't like it, nothing happens, 2/10" while talking about Persona 4. Those guys just don't do their job properly and lie to gamers because they were too lazy to start the second part of the game.