| Boutros said: But that's not what Metacritic does lol |
It gives you all the data you need to do it yourself. i.e. average score, number of positive, negative, mixed reviews. Quotations from the reviews itself.
It doesn't take too much reading and looking into to determine what's what.
You can do all sorts of things to make the average score itself "better" or "more accurate", but just a score alone will always be imperfect. Even if you could develop a system for weeding people out, you still lose valuable information.
For example, if you could limit reviews to only people who have finished the game, you're biasing towards people who thought the game was good enough to be worth finishing. You're losing out on the opinion of everyone who dropped out 5 hours in.
