So, was Nintendo right?

[V-r0cK]

Mnementh said:

V-r0cK said:

This reminds me that Steam now won't accept user score/review unless their account actually purchased the game.  I think this needs to be applied on every review system/websites etc...

Personally I love that idea, but I would go beyond that so that only those that completed the game should be to post their review/score.  Not sure if there's an easy way to check that, but I do know many games will give you a trophy/achievement for finishing the game. So I would make it mandatory for every game to have a trophy/acheivement for completing the campaign mode to allow everyone to know if you finished the game or not.

I know this guy that's on my PSN friends list and he was talking crap about this one game he finished and how it sucked.  I didn't believe him because it's a really popular game loved by many.  So I went and checked his PSN Trophy list; he barely played the game! He only unlocked like the first trophy where you get for just playing the beginning area and thats it!  

...Hate people like that.

Well, in defense of such people: it doesn't make too much sense too play a game you hate. You should refer to your little experience to the game though, if you talk about it.

If you don't enjoy the game fine, but nobody should talk trash or write a review about a game if they never finished it.  It just doesn't make sense.