| sc94597 said: The howlongtobeat isn't yet accurate. Only 81 people were polled. It took me 70 hours to beat the game, and I only have 20% of the content of the game completed after beating it. But in comparison, do you think a review in which all one does is Skyrim's main quest (https://howlongtobeat.com/game.php?id=9859) is accurate?
|
Wait..... are you suggesting he rushed through the game if he finished it in under 40hrs because he gave it a 7/10?
So what about all the other reviewers that gave it a 10/10 having played it in the same amount of time? Did they rush it too?
This is just funny to me, just a week or two earlier when Horizons reviews came out and people were up in arms over some outliner reviews that was dismissed by many here. How quckly the tables have turned.
Its his opnion of the game, and anyone with a lick of sense seeing what the majority of the other reviewers scored the game will see this as nothing more than an outliner review. This is exactly why some of us said during the horizon review fiasco that outliner reviews shouldn't be considered. I am guessing right now that line of thought is more agreeable.
| zero129 said: So your trying to say Nintendo fans are worse then Sony fans?. Heres a hint for you. All Hardcore Fanboys are a problem not just nintendo ones. |
Doesn't matter what I am trying to say or what you think I am saying. At least sony fanboys havent carried out a DDOS attack over a review score. Yes all fanboys are a problem, but apparently some are more a probelm than others. And thisis about hardcore fans as you know.... I am not talking abot the genereally decent ppl that may just choose to support one platform over the other. I am talking about the filth that will do shit like this because a game they like is given a 7/10.
Horizon was given a 5/10..... what do you think these fans in question would have done if zelda got that score?
