| thismeintiel said: Maybe he felt they did it better in Skyrim? Or maybe because he doesn't like the new changes to Zelda? It's not law to like them. They shouldn't care that it dropped one point. That's the freaking point. It's still FUCKING 97!! Jesus Christ. I wish it was an 89, just to see heads explode over a great rating. Even some of the more sane Nintendo fans are trying to defend all this BS. Why not just move on. The example you gave me was No Man's Sky, which he gave a 5. I was asking for the even more insane thing of going apeshit over a 7. Can you give it to me? Has a fanbase done so before? Granted, going nuts over a 5 is fucking stupid, too, as he finds the game just average, which is fine. Still, I really want to see what other fanbase went nuts over a GOOD. |
Maybe the reviewers felt they did towers better in Zelda than Horizon? All of the arguments you can use to justify inconsistency in his reviews can be used with respect to Horizon and Zelda. Ask yourself why it is the case that you didn't see that.
I am sure you do wish it were an 89.
You mentioned a 5 for a game that otherwise got 9's or 10's. No Man's Sky has a 71% Metacritic. A 5 is about as far from 71% as a 7 is from 98% (or now 97%.)
Also a 7 is not good on Metacritic. They label that as "mixed", which is obviously not "positive".
