Pavolink said:
First, nobody is kissing BotW ass. Weapons are all over Hyrule. If there's a problem is space to save those. Secondly, zero stamina problems. You can climb Twin Peaks with the initial stamina ring. No need to upgrade to reach explore Hyrule. And that is one of the highest peaks in the game. Again, there's already a succesful speedrun.
His critique was that unlike other rpgs, once you get the cool loot you get to keep it, instead of it breaking, that is still a valid point.
This isn't criticism. Not even a valid one. This is to personal preference. Making the cool loot break is concistent with the rest of the game. He didn't like it? To bad. Other one like it. Does that mean it is good or bad? No, just a system choosen by devs.
Third, there's nothing difficult in combat. You can kill guardians parrying the laser with pot shields. Lynels are hard but flurry rush make it easier. Add in there buffs from cocking and even less problems.
His criqute regarding the difficulty has to do with the amount of damage enemies do, which forces you to get more health, instead of just being better.
Again. Buffs, parry and flurry rush. Zero needs of more hearts. You can even have yellow hearts.
About Ubisoft Towers, hopefully he is consisten that every game with a tower is a Ubisoft game. Lastly the weather system, especially rain, can be a problem for climbing and I agree.
You can disagree with his critiques, but he isn't plain out wrong, everyone has their own niches.
Ok.
Before you call me a butthurt child, you should try to ask in the first place what is my opinion in the game, because is nowhere need to be my best Zelda game.
It doesn't matter if it's you're favourite or wrong, you dismissed his claims because of the style of his review, and outright called his other points wrong without even knowing them, that is childish.
It matters because you were implying that I was defending the game. I'm not. I'm just pointing how bad is his review. Score does not matter. Content do.
Overall i think his score in conjecture with his points is overblown, but it doesn't make his criticism false.
|
