| RolStoppable said: It depends on what is rated. You can generally say that 7/10 is a good score, but if you handed out that score to rate Tom Brady's career in the NFL, you would get rightfully attacked for being a scumbag or whatever you want to call it. Your credibility would be called into question; again, rightly so. I can't access Jim's site to read the review, but from what I can gather in this thread, Jim's review lacks sense and isn't defensible. That's a bigger issue than the score itself. |
Eh, I'm like 70% in the, "Jim wants attention" camp because it is so occam's razor to me.
Even I have to call out the bolded though.
Games are subjective. Brady has a lot of objective measures like 5 super bowl rings and top 5 all time in passing yards (probably, didn't look this up or anything).
Even so though, I don't know if "attacks" are ever "rightful".
And interestingly enough, pundits do make a career out of being haters of greatness in sports. ESPN has probably made thousands of hours of programming out of one loudmouth doubting LeBron James and another loudmouth arguing in favor of James.
People like controversy and hot takes and big, bold, opinions. Being genuine is mostly optional.
