Jim Sterling’s site under attack after Zelda: BotW review

[dahuman]

potato_hamster said:

Mar1217 said:

Well, as I said in my first post, I knew he would do something along these lines but even not giving this game a proper amount of time without rushing it is pretty absurd.

He's still someone that I'm able to trust when it comes to being more realistic than others but I guess he's probably going for his ''saddic'' pulsion of contradictarian hidden under a good well thoughtout speech.

I bet dollars to donuts that if Jim gave this game a 10/10 you wouldn't begin to question his playtime. The fact of the matter is that we don't actually know how much he played this game other than that he sunk an indeterminant amount of time in the days leading up to a 2-3 day period where he sunk the majority of his time.  That could still result in 40-50 hours of play time overall. Ironically, Jim could have played the game more than the majority of reviewers that gave the game a 10/10 for all we know.

In that regard, I like how KindaFunny does it, they are still playing it between 3 different people before they come out with a review and really taking their time while having fun with the game instead of rushing a review. Just remember that Jim is one person and he has a lot to do so he won't be right on the money every time due to time constraints and the need for ad revenue and keeping his Patreon people happy to keep him going. Not to mention, 7 is not a bad score. Not everybody will think Zelda is a master piece. I just know my personal opinion is that this is a must play, and worth getting a Switch for, if you like the type of game that it is.