Intrinsic said:
I was thinking the same thing, but going with an SSD offers benefits to the entire development process that using HDDs wouldn't allow. Basically, say they go with an sata SSD as standard in every console, the devs can build their games around straming in data from that drive at at least 350MB/s+. As opposed to being locked down to under 100MB/s. That would mean a lot when you consider games built with 4k assets natively. |
Yea but I don't think MS/Sony will care enough about that to do it. I think they would rather have more storage than let developers build games around streaming data, at least for next generation. Cause if they allow external hard drives or replacement hard drives like they have with ps4/x1 and someone puts HDD instead of an SSD, then the games that are built around streaming data will be hit with issues. Sure people could buy external SSDs but I doubt normal people know what a SSD vs a hard drive is. I just think that the advantage of lots of storage for cheap and ease of use when consumers want to add an external hard drive will outweigh the advantages of an SSD. At least for next generation anyway... Specially if MS and Sony wants to head towards the digital route, having lots of space in order to install loads of digital content is a must.
We will see though.
PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850







