By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Intrinsic said:
Between zelda and red dead..... it would be kinda stupid for a publication to score red dead lower than zelda but then vote red dead in for their game of the year. So if we see red dead with a meat of 97/98, then it takes it. If its around 95/94 then zelda takes it.

That's not really true in a lot of cases.  Why would the writer(s) of those reviews get to decide for the entire staff at a publication?  It would just be "Writer X's Game of the Year" instead of "Cabbage Weekly's Game of the Year."