Raistline said:
They will cost around $1,200 which in all honestly I would not mind spending knowing that I won't need a new monitor for at least 5-7 years. However the new monitors by both Acer and Asus are in my So Close, but So Far Away category. They are UHD (4K) monitors when I want/require a QHD (22560x1440) monitor. At the rate of GPU advancement it will still take 2 generations if not more before a single card can run 4K at 60fps+ with all graphical features enabled on the majority of new and upcoming games. For me SLI is not worth the cost since you rarely get more than a 30% gain in FPS and I don't like to go through trouble of enabling and disabling SLI whenever I wish to play an older title. Yeah, I know, I am picky, but being picky as I am helps me get the best possible experience for me. |
That's not being picky, that's knowing what you want/need and accepting nothing less (or more) than that. And that $1,200 that was talked by Asus after the announcement was later confirmed to not be true.
And I'm not a fan of multi-GPU solutions either, so I understand that the cons outweight the pros for you, as they do for me.
Please excuse my bad English.
Currently gaming on a PC with an i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070
Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.