By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kerotan on 09 March 2017
Edit Thread
Pemalite said:
Kerotan said:

Of course you do.  But you can't deny facts.  And facts are a shit load of ps3/360 gamers were blown away by impressive graphics multiple times.  

Well. I can't deny that people weren't blown away by Xbox 360 games. But then again... There are people today who are impressed with Zelda: Breath of the Wilds graphics. *Shudder*
But that doesn't mean the graphics were as impressive as the PC, which by the time Halo 4 dropped, started to look next-gen.

The Playstation 3 and Xbox 360 games typically looked like highly-aliased, low-resolution, blurry, stuttering messes compared to the venerable PC. That is a fact.

But my whole point was they don't have to look anything compared to PC games to be considered good.  

 

And most pc gamers were on a rig less powerful then the ps3 last gen so were their pc versions shit looking too?? 

 

Some ps3 titles like killzone,  uncharted,  ratchet and clank etc etc look superb and were well optimised.  Some pc games looked superb on medium to high end Rigs that were well optimised.  

 

Many had shit optimisation just like some ps3 games did,  aka Skyrim.  many PC games had shit optimisation too. 

 

Point is you didn't need a super powerful pc to have amazing graphics and to this day you still don't.  

 

This year ps4 will be got for $200. And absolute stunners like Uncharted 4 and Horizon will be playable on it. Or the Pro for $299 most likely.  

 

Just because you could run them games better on a  $1000 - $3000 pc doesn't make their graphics any less impressive. 

 

That's my point,  and those are facts.  I'm not interested in shifting the goalposts to keep this going longer then it should.