Profrektius said:
Only because anyone who wants to can make a game now. If you look at the big companies, most games are not bad. Infact obsession over scores, such as if this new game got a 9 or "only" 8, or god forbid a 7, shows that most major games are good. The argument just comes down to if they're "just" good, or are they great, or are they amazing.
I fail to understand how any of the Twilight Zone talk has any relevance to your point about things you are nostalgic about being good. The reason you can see if the show is good or not is because you don't have nostalgia for it. If you did, your view would be biased. Almsot everyone is nostalgic about some terrible songs/games/cartoons/whatever from their childhood and it has very little to do with quality. Hell, it doesn't even have to be childhood. |
Not everyone who loves something old. Is soley riding on nostalgia. A person can have a unbias opinion on it. Why can a person who's in there early 20's, now. Love certain NES games. If you can set yourself to when the game was made. Ignore all the advancements, from future games. And other stuff, that got improved, or less annoying. A good game. Is still a good game. I will play Dragonball Z Butoden 2 or 3 (SFC). Over A lot of the current DBZ games. They're still a good 2D fighter.
I can play Tomb Raider 1 and 2, on PS1. With the horrible controls. I ackonlege the horrible controls. And later games did them better. But, I put myself, into the mindset of 1997. And won't bitch. Why does Lara have to have weird jumps. The games are still good.







