Kerotan said:
Lol so much this! |
Well, no, actually, unless it has the qualifier he added. Otherwise, a simple "remake" would mean to do the same thing over. "Re-" means, basically, "again". If they're changing key elements that made up the identity of the original then they're creating something new using the original as a base. Of course, how far something goes before it can still be called a "remake" will always be up for debate, but it's perfectly within reason for someone to question the term being used if the new version makes meaningful changes.








