By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
sc94597 said:
SeriousWB said:
sc94597 said:
Rath said:
sc94597 said:
 

Yes , but the basis of the alphabet didn't orginate in england did it? It is an adaptation of many alphabets such as the latin and the greek's. So we should use the original way to pronounce it if he says that.


BUT Q A X NEVER SAID WHERE THE ALPHABET ORIGINATED!!!

Lol you seem to be getting angry. I was saying if they do that then they might as well use the first pronouncation for the letter. Just because a different dialect of a language uses Zee and the original dialect uses Zed doesn't mean Zed is automatically more valid. You could say that Zeta is more valid than Zed because it was the original way to pronounce it.

 


No you couldn't because it's a different language altogether, I don't know how many people have to tell you this before it hits home.

So you agree that Zee is incorrect because it's different from the original pronounciation used by english speakers. Then let's say any language such as english that developed of dialects of other languages is incorrect because it's not the original.

 


English is a language, Greek is a different language.

SOME of the letters originated in Greece, but they are not Greek anymore they are different letters used in different ways.

The English letter Z originated in the English language. It was "inspired" (for want of a better word) by the Greek letter zeta, but they are still different letters. Wheras in US.English and English the letter Z is used in the same words and performs the same sounds.