Nem said:
I'm the one has to say "Wow"... and why i was reluctant to answer your questions. You are still unabe to grasp that we aren't talking about children. You just love to bring the 5 and 2 year olds into this. Soon you are gonna talk about them still in the womb. Get real dude, you have way too many preconceptions that impede you from thinking critically. The world is not back and white. I think this conversation has gone on long enough. |
Yes we are talking about children. 12 year olds are children. According to 192 nations in the world.
I brought up younger children, as I mentioned several times, to establish the point that at a certain age, we can conclude that a person is always unable to consent. I assumed that would be a point we would easily agree on, and we could move on to figure out where that mark should be, and whether 12 years old was past it. It did not occur to me that you would argue against this point. But, you proved me wrong by repeatedly insisting that there is no age where we can always conclude consent is impossible. And when I point out how insane that is, you act offended that I even brought it up, when you're the one suggesting that maybe a five year old can consent. Maybe that's just because you have no coherent response to the point, and are trying to deflect it by acting faux offended.
Cause some things are black and white. I thought the fact that certain ages cannot consent to sexual activity would be something so black and white that we could agree, and then build on that... but I guess not. So, point blank, can we conclude that five year olds are never able to consent? If you can't answer that with a simple no, then don't act like I'm the one saying crazy shit.
