LordTheNightKnight on 04 June 2008
| amp316 said: I understand that, but like I was implying, the Wii needs as much decent 3rd party support as possible. If Ubisoft have a few diamonds in the crap then they should be bought in order to tell them that those are the type of games that they should be releasing. I mean I don't think anyone here is going to buy one of those Petz games. |
The thing is that if it turns out there are no diamonds to buy (which is what started the uproar even before that forum response), the point would be to not even buy the diamonds on the HD systems (and some 360 and PS3 owners said they would actually do it). Nothing, until ubisoft promises the Wii those diamonds, so we have the chance to buy them.
The point would be because if a developer thinks they can piss on one demographic, they could piss on more, and a boycott would be one way of letting them no we wouldn't take it.
A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.
Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs
