Do You Accept Evolution as a Fact?

[Pemalite]

HollyGamer said:

VGPolyglot said:

Yes, it says that supports a scientific theory. So yes, evolution is a scientific theory with scientific evidence.

which evidence?   to have evidence they need to gather all of the prove for all the missing link of evolution.   

No. You aren't required to have *every* piece of a puzzle to build the entire picture.

You only need to have *enough* pieces of the puzzle in order to build a model and fill the gaps in to build your theory.

Of course, as you get more pieces of the puzzle, the model and theory can and will change.

Rogerioandrade said:

This is exactly what I said before: people prefer to be divisive and to polarize science and religion instead of trying to understand that , although different in essence as human knowledge, both are necessary for mankind in their own way and people can live with both ideas, if they´re smart and tolerant enough for that.

What use does religion have exactly?

It doesn't forward human knowledge with facts, it doesn't cure disease, it doesn't allow us to traverse space and time, it doesn't improve our standard of living, it doesn't give us better yielding crops, it doesn't even make us more moral, it holds back equality and equity.

Although I stand by the fact people are entitled to believe in whatever religion they want... That doesn't mean I see a point in it.

The big difference with Science and Religion though is... Science is built around evidence, Religion is built around belief without evidence.
Science will often contradict things in Religion and vice-versa, but only one has evidence to support itself... And that is science, ergo, the two aren't always compatible.