By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
The_Yoda said:
numberwang said:

Take a physics book form a hundred years ago and think about all the true facts

- atoms can not be split
- the milky way is all of the universe
- the universe is static, eternal and had no beginning
- light is movement of the aether

Think again how much we will discard from our facts in a hundred years

Absolutely perfect.  Most of what is below was defended as "fact" once upon a time quite similar to the pages of responses we've seen here in this thread.  The theories many here are claiming as FACT will likely look quite different in another thousand years when our perspective is greater. We are still such scientific infants but too many are too proud of the leaps we've made in the last couple hundred years to see past their hubris.

Superseded scientific theories

Biology

Chemistry

Physics

  • Democritus, the originator of atomic theory, held that everything is composed of atoms, which are indestructible
  • John Dalton's model of the atom, which held that atoms are indivisible and indestructible (superseded by nuclear physics) and that all atoms of a given element are identical in mass (superseded by discovery of atomic isotopes).[1]
  • Plum pudding model of the atom—assuming the protons and electrons were mixed together in a single mass
  • Rutherford model of the atom with an impenetrable nucleus orbited by electrons
  • Bohr model with quantized orbits
  • Electron cloud model following the development of quantum mechanics in 1925 and the eventual atomic orbital models derived from the quantum mechanical solution to the hydrogen atom

Astronomy and cosmology

Geography and climate

  • Flat Earth theory. On length scales much smaller than the radius of the Earth, a flat map projection gives a quite accurate and practically useful approximation to true distances and sizes, but departures from flatness become increasingly significant over larger distances.
  • Terra Australis
  • Hollow Earth theory
  • The Open Polar Sea, an ice-free sea once supposed to surround the North Pole
  • Rain follows the plow – the theory that human settlement increases rainfall in arid regions (only true to the extent that crop fields evapotranspirate more than barren wilderness)
  • Island of California – the theory that California was not part of mainland North America but rather a large island

Geology

Psychology

  • Pure behaviorist explanations for language acquisition in infancy, falsified by the study of cognitive adaptations for language.[2]

Medicine

Science never claims to know something with certitude. It gives the best estimate we can get with the means available. Scientists know that their models will eventually be reworked. Scientists also tend to know where the biggest uncertitudes are. It is not to be forgotten that progress in the last century has been far beyond anything we have seen previously, thanks to a global uniformized collaboration and a greater focus on education.

 

Many of those you named were, despite their flaws, a major step in the right direction.



Bet with PeH: 

I win if Arms sells over 700 000 units worldwide by the end of 2017.

Bet with WagnerPaiva:

 

I win if Emmanuel Macron wins the french presidential election May 7th 2017.