Do You Accept Evolution as a Fact?

[LivingMetal]

Flilix said:

LivingMetal said:

No.  Unless it's been observed and tested in a controlled environment with consistant results, it's not science.  Not fact.  Now, we've seen variations of animals within a type (however you want to define it) of animal such as a variety of dogs or a variety of cattle, but no one has ever seen a dog turn into a cow.  The evolutionary theory doesn't dictate that cows came from dogs, but you get my principle here without havign to split hairs.  Are there mutations, yes.  But no one has seen an animal turn into another animal.  There are even too many gaps in the fossil records to support it as fact/science.  The fossil record is just "arranging stuff" based on paradigm.

How do you define a species?

That's a good question because "species" is a means devised my human kind to differentiate types or kinds of animals.  As I mentioned early, splitting hairs doesn't do any one any good becuase it establishes un-needed strawmen.