By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
onionberry said:
irstupid said:

Why should it matter if it's the first game or not? I'm not going to cut Nintendo any slack in Zelda for things I want in an open world game. I'm not going to give it a pass for something that is common place or makes open world games better being missing.

Nintendo and Guerilla Games had a multitude of Open world games to look at, play, test, read what people like/hate, ect to implement them into their games. Nintendo has came out and said they played and looked at the open world games out there to help, adn I'm assuming GG people have too. Thus they should be implementing current open world game stuff and thus not be compared to Assassins Creed 1 or Morrowind or something.

They should be compared to current games. Whether its their first open world outing or not.

well I'm just saying, the game is good and the negatives are not that bad or a reason to not play the game

Didn't say anything like that. From everything I have seen and heard this is a great Open World game.

It has areas it could improve upon, but it didn't do anything bad that open world games have fixed.

The always present criticism of side quests compared to Witcher 3 is there, but I'll give all games a bit to adjust on that front. Witcher 3 is still a relatively new release and most games releasing today were well into development when Witcher 3 came out and showed the world how to do side qeusts. So even though the side quests I've seen in Horizon are still all fetch qeusts, they are better fetch qeusts than in the past, or some present games (FF15, looking at you)