By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
WolfpackN64 said:
mausy said:

This "far-right wing movements" is commonly used false simplification. it's not a farce, it's simple most basic and historic distinguish between left and right. I know this concepts are now devalued, because people call everything what is politically incorrect as right, but it's not my problem. Mussolini described fascism by the simple sentence: everything in state, nothing outside the state. I have also one more interesting quote in this topic made by Churchill this time. He Said after the WWII, that there will come time when anti-fascists will be called fascists by true fascists. What a prophetic...

It's not a "false simplification", it's an academically accepted fact. You can twist things in your head as much as you want, that doesn't make it right.

I'm not twist things in my head, I just use simple logic. We live in semantic chaos and I know that, but I don't see any characteristics of fascism  which will correspond with right wing characteristics. (You do?) On the other hand I see many which correspond with left (e.g. on the field of the subjectivity of the individual, relation state-individual, economy etc.) I also love this "academically accepted fact" argument. You don't have to think by yourself because is "academically accepted" (btw it's "accepted" more in image created by mainstream media than by actual historians and politologist). The same i see in e.g. global warming issue. Did you read Cialdini's book Influence: Science and Practice? This phenomenon has been well described there.

Regards one more time ;)

Regards one more time.