Goatseye said:
-Ofcourse he didn't close Guantanamo. It wasn't in the interest of Congress, Intelligence Community or Republicans. Also, it was naive of Obama to try to insist to get it done through bipartisan efforts. -Other than Manning, who else is still there? And like I said, retrieving government top secret info won't get you free pass to walk no matter what, without being cleared. -So you're against deportation of illegal immigrants? -Like I said, banks hold a huge percentage of US debt. Even with majorities in chambers, there's little they could do. If the banks had not get bailed out, it would've caused a domino effect of banks falling up to the top banks. People would've made runs to the banks and most people's savings and money would've been rendered useless. Shadow economy would've settled, there would be no money for firms to lend to start up, expand or stop lay offs. You'll have to forget about debit and credit cards and socially that would lead to rise in burglaries as money are would be stored in "mattresses". Bro, anything related to socialism socialism or even worse communism is shot down here. Cancer cure could be a communism invention and it would be shot down. |
- He had congress for two years. He could have done it in that time, but didn't
- I'm against the existence of states and borders in general. I support a stateless, classless world, so yes I am against Obama deporting them, because they're mainly just trying to seek a better life
- Well, the banks failing would mainly have hurt people with a lot of savings, in other words richer people as most people don't have really any money at all in the bank. If the banks failed the many people who became homeless would instead just own their houses
Yes, I realize that socialism/communism is viewed negatively in the United States. Obama wants to keep it that way too, because he's a multimillionaire with a lot of influence and corporate backing. That's why he's not on my side, and why I'll never support him.
