By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
S.T.A.G.E. said:
zorg1000 said:

Wait, so your reasoning is that Switch is more powrrful than 3DS, therefore it will get less games?

I'm pretty sure Vita, XBO & PS4 are all more powerful and recieve more games than 3DS so your reasoning makes no sense.

Actually, The vita had major droughts and very few system sellers. The 3DS had a larger library of games which were quicker and easier to make. What Sony was going for with the Vita was a platform that could have powerful games on the go and because they did not secure neither eough third party nor exclusives it floudnered opposed to the platofms they deal with in a much more reasonable way. For Nintenndo that primary would be the portable and for Sony that would be the home console.

 

There is nothting incorrect about saying that HD games take longer to make. When the market is already preoccupied the busier they get the harder it is to get to secure novel games. Nintendo and Sony both need to understand these lessons on their own way.

Vita has more games than 3DS, XBO has more games than 3DS, PS4 has more games than 3DS. All of those platforms have also been out for a shorter period of time.

Your argument that Switch will have less gsmes than 3DS because its more powerful is invalid.



When the herd loses its way, the shepard must kill the bull that leads them astray.