Carzy Zarx’s PC Gaming Emporium - Catch Up on All the Latest PC Gaming Related News

[JEMC]

Captain_Yuri said:

JEMC said:

By the way, with all the hope and also hype behind Ryzen thanks to its comparisons to Intel's 8-core behemoths, here's a new leak that shakes all the positiveness a little bit and puts, in my opinion, things in their due place:

First AMD Ryzen 7 1700 vs Core i7 7700K Stock Gaming Performance Benchmarks in GTA V and Cinebench
http://wccftech.com/amd-ryzen-7-1700-gaming-performance-benchmarks-leak/

Ryzen is faster in Cinebench (obviosuly, it has twice the cores and threads), but loses in GTA V

*benches*

Ryzen is 5% slower on average.

 

Well to be fair, the i7 is at 4ghz+ at stock where as Ryzen is at 3.0-3.4Ghz so I can see why the i7 would win. What these testers really need to do is start comparing clock speeds cause I want to see how these cpus do clock per clock.

Its a shame we don't have any quad cores or 6 cores from AMD right now cause I would like to see how well they OC.

Well, the clock per clock comparisons are already done... but against Intel's Broadwell CPUs. But I have no doubt that someone will underclock a 7700K to Ryzen levels to see how they compare.

And I hope the 6 and 4 cores overclock well. I mean, with the 6-core/12-threads 1600-/X having the same TDP of the 1800X/1700X, I'd hope that they have more heatroom to overclock them higher. And the same goes for the 4-core chips.