I'm starting to f*cking hate this site for all the problems it's having as of late. I had to rewrite this whole post twice due to the mess this place is.
WoodenPints said:
I was looking at them on here that had them same clock speeds as the 8 cores and they are different to the table you posted? - http://wccftech.com/amd-ryzen-5-3-launch-1600x-performance-reveal/ AMD Ryzen 5 Series Processor Lineup:
|
I got that table from this Guru3D article: http://www.guru3d.com/news-story/amd-ryzen-launches-march-2nd.html
The problem here is, I think, that AMD still hasn't confirmed the specs of the 5 & 3 series, so it's still a bit up to speculation.
By the way, with all the hope and also hype behind Ryzen thanks to its comparisons to Intel's 8-core behemoths, here's a new leak that shakes all the positiveness a little bit and puts, in my opinion, things in their due place:
First AMD Ryzen 7 1700 vs Core i7 7700K Stock Gaming Performance Benchmarks in GTA V and Cinebench
http://wccftech.com/amd-ryzen-7-1700-gaming-performance-benchmarks-leak/
Ryzen is faster in Cinebench (obviosuly, it has twice the cores and threads), but loses in GTA V
Testing setup:
- Intel i7 7700K / AMD RYZEN 7 1700
- Gigabyte Z270 Ultra Gaming X / ASUS ROG Crosshair VI Hero
- NVIDIA GTX 1080
- Corsair Vengeance 3000MHz DDR4
- Corsair 1000W RMX PSU
- Corsair H115i AIO Cooler
- Samsung 250GB 850 EVO
Ryzen is 5% slower on average.
m_csquare said:Dell release a new HDR monitor and its price is too good to be true.
Quick Specs...
Brightness
400 cd/m² (typical)
|
To be HDR10 (the standard) compatible, it needs to have a brightness of 1,000 cd/m². So this monitor uses an HDR solution from Dell (or maybe LG, which is probably the supplier of the monitor panel), which may or may not work with all HDR content.
Please excuse my bad English.
Currently gaming on a PC with an i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070
Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.