Ka-pi96 said:
Oh I expect it would! You say the best are chosen which is true, but that will be the issue since most of the time men will be the best, and not by a small margin either. So when none of the good teams hire women and the ones that do get hired aren't paid anywhere near as much (because they're not as good) the complaints that would generate... |
Maybe I had not expressed myself very well. Saying Neymar is better than my girlfriend in soccer is not sexism. Picking the best is not sexism. Sexism is a prejudiced form we perceive things. Like thinking that a woman cannot drive just because she's a woman. That is sexism and that's not true at all. But realizing Sharapova plays better than me (I love to play tennis) isn't sexism. It's just true. Of course she would get higher payment. And if we only have a unisex football league, for example, of course that will be more men than women. That's why I'm totally against unified leagues. It wouldn't work not because of sexism, not because a prejudiced form of view, it wouldn't work because of the natural differences between genders. Same reason why a transgender man shouldn't compete with a woman, because in biological terms, he's still a man and that would be unfair.







