Currently Online 
Bandorr said:
When at least 6 people threaten to quit unless he is fired - he was fired. You can argue semantics of "He was fired", "he was let go", "they let him quit" etc. If he actually had the support of the peers and website he wouldn't have quit. He would have written article after article. Constantly attacked the evil liberal, and basically done what he has constantly done. Yet here he is - without a job. They most likely let him keep a little bit of his dignity by letting him quit. But let's not be fooled - if he didn't quit, he would have been fired. |
If that were the case, I doubt he'd speak positively of Breitbart. There is a difference between resigning because you will be let go and being fired. One is a much more peaceful and mutual decision, the other -- not.
And it wasn't liberals who made this push. It was conservatives at National Review who don't like Milo.
