By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Miyamotoo on 21 February 2017
Edit Thread
Wyrdness said:
Miyamotoo said:

And yet you dont have anuting to backup any of your argument.

Make it simply, what exatly flaws did OoT had in 98"?

TP has much more bigger world than OoT but was barren and has less things in it then OoT, and we talking about game that was released 7 years after OoT so actually it was expected to have those things done better and actualy done those thing worse. Lol at your point that TP had better pacing than OoT, TP has worst and slowest opening for any 3D Zelda and thas well know thing, OoT pacing is great and miles better than TPs. Fact is that SS is most linear 3D Zelda game, bactracking was also worst, you need to back 3 time in each region of game. Offcourse that buy time newer games will have some better areas than aged game, but all 3D Zelda games after OoT had some flaws and some things done worse than OoT, while OoT was almost perfect game and all things were dont great, you cant say that for any other 3D Zelda game.

I gave you clear examples, but your only argument is "its nostalgia", but like I wrote read reviews of OoT from 98" any you will see that has anuthing with nostalgia or "only its beacuse 1st 3D Zelda game".

No you've done sod all as far as examples go that doesn't as you keep repeating your nostalgic opinion of OOT where as everyone else is pointing out concrete situational factors.

Want to know some flaws of OOT, texts popping up that break pacing, midi quality sound, erratic jumping mechanic, camera issues, lack of direction in several instances, some poor design choices as pointed out by Mzuzek, back tracking which is actually on par with SS, recycled story, inconsistent pacing etc... OOT as shown has equivalent or more flaws then the games after it like Mzuzek pointed out the techincal achievements of the game made many people look past it and many people like yourself still do.

Again learn to argue properly rather than quote one line and try take it as far out of context because what I've posted is well with in plausibility because for one you've not in any case highlighted any other game at the time that would be like the mainline 3D Zelda games after OOT let alone match them, not one example. Instead your only response are null and void arguments like rating and your nostalgia.

No you didnt, and "as everyone else is pointing out concrete situational factors", you mean someone like Muzek who played almost 15 years after launch of OoT and who don't realise that every game age!? :D

Text popping up is flaw!? First time hear about that someone consider that for flaw, that definatly wasnt flaw in 98", OoT had great sound for 98", jumping mehanic, camera were actualy all great for 98". Offcourse that backtracking isnt on pair with SS, in SS you need to back 3x time in each of region, story was also great for 98", pacing also. You do realise that none of those things you mentioned are not flaws in 98" and 1st generation of 3D games, and actually were all done great and actually better than in other games from that time!? Nobady complained about any of those things in 98" you can read any Zelda rewiew from 98".

I gave you clear examaples in comparison with other 3D games, but you ingored all that and said that "TP has better pacing than OoT", wich doent make any sense.

Again its has nothing with nostalgia, I am in gaming from 3. gen, I had almost all Sega, Sony and Nintendo consoles, Zelda OoT isnt my 1st or last Zelda that I played, so it doesnt has anuthing with nostalgia.

 

You keep ignoring clear facts and you have nothing to backup your claims that OoT gets so much praise only beause "its 1st 3D Zelda" or that "any 3D Zelda would have same effect", so I dont have any intention to spend any of my time on arguing with you.