By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
irstupid on 15 February 2017
Edit Thread
mZuzek said:
monocle_layton said:

So one game out of a plethora. Can't use one game that was ruined with a gimmick to predict BotW will be incomplete as well.

If they hadn't been so obsessed with the gamepad, it really could've been the sequel we all wanted. I'd understand if it was in 2013/14, but literally everyone was over the gamepad by the time the game released.

Here's to hoping a potential Star Fox Switch breaks away from the Wii U curse

I'm not talking about controls, though. Honestly, I wasn't even that bothered by them - the real reason the game was disappointing was just the extreme lack of meaningful content. The game was consisted of a really cool ~4 hour playthrough, and... um, that was it, actually.

Anyways. It was the first Star Fox in 10 years and sold like crap. I don't think we'll see another one so soon, even if I really want to. If anything, they should just consider Zero a proper reboot and recreate the story starting from there.

Totally ignored the Star Fox game, never relaly been into star fox. Did play the adventure one on teh GC and thought that was fun. Not teh best adventure game, but still good.

But how long was teh original star fox? I feel like you could probably beat that in a few hours too. Heck most praised games in teh past were very short.

But if this is about content, we have that leaked Breath of the Wild info that amazon posted related to the guide. Something like 120 some challenges, and 75 side quests or something. Then the dev or someone saying it woudl take you a week to beat the game at least. That sounds liek plenty of content, especially when most all non-rpg's can be beat in one sitting.

But just glancing at this game, you can tell it is the biggest Zelda game. And most all Zelda games take like 40+ hours to beat.