By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Acevil said:
RolStoppable said:

I don't get you. You are defending a €20 Zelda expansion that we know little off and at the same time attacking a €20 Fates campaign that is eight optional maps longer than Conquest which you deem worth €40.

I felt satisfied by Conquest, I do not want to replay it to see the middle path is my reasoning. It is like ask me to replay a game for just for neutral ending of said game. Given I might want Revelations later in the year, if I feel an real itch to play something tactical to bind me to the next main fire emblem game. 

Also I won't be getting the $20 Zelda expansion until after winter when i do know what it is. 

Conquest and Birthright are not exactly something you can compare to 'optional endings' or whatever.

I mean take any bethesda game, like KOTOR or something. People replay those games to play as good or as evil. But in the end the game is essentially the same.

Conquest and Birthright are completely different. They are not just the exact same battles with you on the opposin side.